Get in touch
If you have any questions relating to this article or have any property matters you would like to discuss, please contact the Residential Property Team.
The method we often see in residential property transactions is the application of an indemnity policy to ‘paper over the cracks’ of property and title defects. Whether that be – missing building regulations certificates, lack of easement or breach of planning – an indemnity policy can be a valuable tool to enable clients to continue to purchase a property with added financial protection of a policy in the event of a claim, especially where a lender is involved.
Our role as legal advisors is to scrutinise the title to highlight such risks which could be inherited by buyers and consider the best interests of our client.
An example of a scenario encountered is where, it’s apparent that a parcel of land was omitted from original registration. Land, which is critical to the enjoyment of the property, such as part of the driveway.
At first glance, an indemnity policy may appear to offer a convenient and cost-effective solution. However, for discerning clients, reliance on indemnity insurance in such circumstances is often inappropriate.
Indemnity policies are designed to compensate for financial loss arising from title defects, not to resolve the underlying issue.
In the context of our above example, several limitations arise:
An indemnity policy does not rectify ownership or grant a right of way.
While the policy may address financial loss in the event of a claim, it leaves the client exposed to ongoing uncertainty.
An insurer is only ever providing financial cover in the event of a claim; the role of the client is not to highlight the defect to any third party.
Restrictions within the policy can include:
Property purchases are often an investment for clients, so it’s appropriate to consider what their long-term intention is. Should the client seek enhancement, redevelopment or refinancing of the property, restrictions included in indemnity policies may not be commercially viable.
It’s not all about the purchase. Client’s value advice that shows we are truly acting in their best interest, not just to push the transaction through. A consideration needs to be made about how this should impact the client when they come to sell.
A known discrepancy, even if insured, may:
An indemnity policy can introduce friction in future transactions, particularly where the land in question is integral to access or parking.
Lenders and valuers often adopt a cautious stance.
A defect affecting access or enjoyment of the property, even if insured, may:
Indemnity insurance has its place within conveyancing practice and can be a pragmatic solution in certain low-risk scenarios. However, it is not always the optimal approach.
The goal should not simply be to insure over the problem, it’s to consider the intention of the client and how well it would suit their best interests for both their short and long-term goals.
With respect to our missing land example, a transfer of part was the right way forward. A swift approach was made the landowner to deal with the land transfer, which will resolve the defect entirely. The client can proceed with the purchase with the knowledge that they do not need to deal with the hassle of a potential claim or headache when they come to sell.
Not all title rectifications need to be protracted; you just need the right advice and the people on board to make it happen.
Share:
If you have any questions relating to this article or have any property matters you would like to discuss, please contact the Residential Property Team.

Sign up to receive the latest news on areas of interest to you. We can tailor the information we send to you.
Sign up to our newsletter