Get in touch
If you have any questions relating to this article or have any legal disputes you would like to discuss, please contact the Dispute Resolution team on [email protected]
Building on part 1, what a landlord can make a deduction from a residential tenant’s deposit for, and part 2, how much a landlord can claim, the following will explore how a landlord can best prepare throughout a residential tenancy, in case a deposit deduction related dispute arises, and the process of claiming from a tenant’s deposit if need be.
The tenancy deposit acts as a form of insurance - if a tenant meets the terms of their tenancy agreement and leaves the property in a similar condition to what it was let to them in, they can expect to have the deposit returned to them at the end of the tenancy. If not, the landlord can look to be reimbursed by the deposit, by making a deduction or claim from it.
Common deductions from the tenant’s deposit include where a tenant has caused damage, damaged or removed contents, returned the property in a worse condition than when it was let to them in save for wear and tear, left belongings behind at the end of the tenancy, or fallen into arrears. The burden of proof though is on the landlord to evidence any claim they think they might have, to the tenant’s deposit. The deposit is the tenant’s money which belongs to them until such time that the landlord successfully proves their claim. This is why it is so important for a landlord to monitor and keep appropriate records throughout the tenancy in case a deposit deduction dispute comes about, because by the time such a dispute actually arises, it is generally too late to retrospectively put together the necessary evidence for a successful claim, then.
Therefore, landlords should keep the following clear, comprehensive and accurate records throughout every tenancy, to ensure that they are well equipped to evidence any claim to the tenant’s deposit should they need to make one:
If a landlord wishes to make any deductions or claim from their tenant’s deposit, then they should first try to agree this with the tenant. If an agreement cannot be reached as to who should receive the deposit or how it should be shared, then the landlord cannot just simply take what they believe they are owed – to do so would be a breach of the landlord/managing agent’s stakeholder responsibility.
Instead, the landlord will have to look to make a court claim, or use the free dispute resolution service of the deposit protection scheme protecting that deposit. Each of the three government approved deposit protection schemes (one of which a landlord must use whenever he grants a assured shorthold tenancy where a deposit is taken) offer a free service to impartially resolve deposit disputes by assessing the evidence, such as photos, videos, inventory and check-out reports. Either the landlord or tenant can refer the issue of deductions from the deposit to the deposit protection scheme, for them to them to adjudicate.
The deposit protection scheme’s adjudicators will impartially assess the evidence provided by the parties – although as above, the burden of proof is on the landlord to justify any deduction they want to make, and the adjudicators will make a decision on the ‘balance of probabilities’ as to what should be awarded to who. The scheme’s decision is final.
Landlords should be alert to the fact that the tenant’s deposit belongs to the tenant; until such time that the landlord can justify a claim from it, and that the burden of proof is on them as the landlord to evidence their claim. It is not a given that the landlord will be able to make a deduction from the deposit, the tenant either needs to agree or the landlord needs to be able to provide the required evidence to the adjudicator for them to make a decision, or to the court. Knowing this, landlords should have a renewed sense of motivation to ensure that appropriate checks are undertaken before, throughout and after every tenancy, and that comprehensive records are kept.
It is important that landlords take steps in advance and throughout the tenancy to prepare for a deposit deduction dispute, as often whether a deduction is required hasn’t fully crystallised, or how much should be deducted hasn’t actually been discussed or agreed between the parties, until the end of the tenancy when it is too late to retrospectively put together that evidence. The landlord is not just entitled to the money because in their view it is reasonable. There needs to be a contractual basis of the amount and a justification of the losses suffered.
We are on hand to assist landlords or tenants with deposit, or landlord and tenant related disputes. You can contact us at [email protected].
Consistent with our policy when giving comment and advice on a non-specific basis, we cannot assume legal responsibility for the accuracy of any particular statement. In the case of specific problems we recommend that professional advice be sought.
Share:
If you have any questions relating to this article or have any legal disputes you would like to discuss, please contact the Dispute Resolution team on [email protected]
Sign up to receive the latest news on areas of interest to you. We can tailor the information we send to you.
Sign up to our newsletter